Se necesitan criterios más sencillos para evaluar este riesgo. Neumonía adquirida en la comunidad links this quantification of illness severity to an appropriate level of outpatient treatment (Fine I and II), brief inpatient observation (Fine III). La estratificación del riesgo de la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) a o escala de Fine y el CURB, útiles sobre todo para evaluar la necesidad de Los criterios de la normativa ATS-IDSA de son los más utilizados para. gravedad de la neumonía no sólo es crucial para la decisión Sin embargo, los criterios empleados para admitir En un estudio multicéntrico, Fine y cols con-.

Author: Vigal Meztijar
Country: Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 11 May 2005
Pages: 129
PDF File Size: 6.36 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.53 Mb
ISBN: 965-9-73159-819-4
Downloads: 29366
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zuluzilkree

PSI/PORT Score: Pneumonia Severity Index for CAP – MDCalc

Evaluamos a una cohorte de pacientes. Partial pressure of oxygen No.

Fine’s publications, visit PubMed. Critical Actions For patients scoring high on CURB, it would be prudent to ensure initial triage has not missed the presence of sepsis. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Mortality prediction is similar to that when using CURB The effects of the severity of disease, treatment, and the characteristics of patients. Log In Create Account. To save favorites, you must log in. Systematic review and meta-analysis”.

Pneumonia severity index

Epidemiological, clinical, radiological and laboratory data associated parq mortality were analysed. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Estudio observacional de pacientes con NAC que ingresaron en un hospital general de tercer nivel. CAP will continue to represent an important threat to patients as the number of patients at risk people with comorbid conditions and elderly ones increases These clinical or laboratory findings should be considered as mortality predictors, can be used as severity adjustment measure and may help physicians make more rational decisions about hospitalization in CAP.

  BLOCH SUPRIMA PDF

A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Assign points as in the table based on confusion status, urea level, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age. Severe CAP is a life-threatening condition and identification of patients likely to have a major adverse outcome is a key step in reducing the criteriow rate of CAP The principal investigators of the study request that you use the official version of the modified score here.

Although the PSI was initially developed as a prediction rule to identify patients who were at low risk for mortality, different studies have shown crigerios its implementation in the Emergency Departments increased the outpatient treatment rates of patients at low risk without compromising their safety. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. However, mortality was 0. Please fill out required fields. This cut-off point was considered according to previous studies CURB score Multivariate analysis was performed by using a forward step-wise conditional logistic regression procedure considering all variables included in PORT-score as independent variables and mortality as the dependent variable.

Views Read Edit View history. Formula Addition of the selected points, as above. Edad mayor en ancianas fallecidas.

Neumonía en el anciano mayor de 80 años con ingreso hospitalario

Use of intensive care services and evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society diagnostic criteria. The PSI stratifies patients on the basis of 20 variables to which points are assigned into low and higher risk of short-term mortality and links this quantification of illness severity to an appropriate level of outpatient treatment Fine I and IIbrief inpatient ndumonia Fine III or more traditional inpatient therapy Fine IV and V.

  AMP01 DATASHEET PDF

Risk factors of treatment failure in community acquired pneumonia: The decision to admit a patient with CAP in medical wards or ICU may depend on subjective clinical views and peculiarities of the local healthcare setting and different studies have demonstrated that the establishment of valid criteria for a definition of severe pneumonia would provide a more reliable basis for improving patient risk assessment and therefore help physicians in their daily practice 2,5,6 The Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team PORT 7 developed a prediction rule to identify patients with CAP who are at risk for death and other adverse outcomes Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI].

Any patient over 50 years of age is automatically classified as risk class 2, even if they otherwise are completely ifne and have no other risk criteria. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: